Tal Frank | Special Projects
page,page-id-50491,page-template-default,edgt-core-1.1.2,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,vigor child-child-ver-1.0.0,vigor-ver-1.8.1, vertical_menu_with_scroll,smooth_scroll,fade_push_text_top,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-,vc_responsive

Hothouse 2012 

Collaborative Project with Keren Anavy
Dan Gallery for Contemporary Art


Ink Drawings and Objects cast Aluminium and Swarovski Beads


The inspiration for Hothouse, our joint project, is the hothouse as both a visual and metaphorical image, as a locus and breeding ground designed to rule nature and organize it. In our exhibition, the hothouse is expropriated from its original use, while the gallery space is made into an arena of research whose derivative objects are cultured and managed only in appearance. The starting point for our project was the ecological greenhouse established by artist Avital Geva in Kibbutz Ein Shemer in 1977, together with Rafi Shapira.* The eco- greenhouse at Ein Shemer, which remains active to this day, is an innovative learning environment for environmental studies, art and further disciplines, and serves as an experimental site for social and artistic research.

In our project we have constructed a kind of fictive breeding ground for gems and artifacts – such as diamonds, which are a recurrent theme in our work. But while hothouses are normally designed to regulate nature and manage the cultivation of its products, our art hothouse yields forms and objects that break the fundamental pact with nature – objects that, in terms of their materiality and treatment, tread the thin line between control and the loss of it: The black ink drawings that hang on the walls outline an arena of confrontation in which ink is to be tamed and mastered, despite its essential fluidity; and the various sculptural objects scattered on the floor, which at first sight seem as ceramic vessels made at the potter’s wheel, are in fact aluminum casts devoid of any utility, and are suggestive of production and industry.

Our use of the ink drawing technique, along with that of metal casting, introduces a dimension of play between the governed and incidental, the contingent and planned, and between attempting to discipline matter, to rule it and camouflage it as another – and ultimately succumbing to it. We aspire to offer the viewer an experience that conveys a longing for a new order of things, a different, alternative framework where the beautiful is confronted with the ugly. This experience finds its expression in finely-made artifacts, even as they maintain a degree of deliberate roughness. The monochrome that

dominates the exhibition, whether in the stylized minimal ink strokes or in the excess ‘chatter’ the hothouse generates, brings about an equivocal system where beauty is mixed with morbid overtones. The hothouse depicted in the drawings is therefore something of a floating, unfounded utopia, which indeed seems to lack any hold on the ground in any of the drawings. It appears rather as a complex, laden site, as a surreal sphere of an ever straying reality, or as a novel framework where form and content are cast into shape.

The works on display reference geometric and architectural structures on several levels: The hothouse structure in the ink drawings, with its inclined roof and geometric water basins, also echoes the diamond-like structures it houses – emblems of wealth and felicity, which also represent an unattainable ideal of flawless order and symmetry. In contrast, the sculptural, ceramic- seeming objects evoke cinerary urns or stupa monuments – Buddhist burial shrines, their mound-like domes growing pointed spikes that carry phallic significances, but are also symbolic of death. Despite first appearing as containers or as objects rooted in traditional pottery, they are in fact completely sealed and therefore without any use value – but rather the vegetal mutations that have sprouted in the fictive hothouse. These are containers unable to contain, decorative items that fail to embellish their surrounding space.

The new ecological order proposed here is a seductive and enchanting one, where diamonds glitter and decorative vessels grow – an order that generates new concepts of beauty. But it is also a disrupted ecological order, whose objects of beauty posit an illusion abound with contradictions: The mock ceramic urns, made of cast aluminum, were produced using sand molds which lent them the somewhat faded, ragged aspect of archeological finds dug-up from the ground – as surviving relics of an ancient-futuristic civilization. Only partially polished, they appear at times shiny and at times coarse; beside them are heavy iron balls evocative of led weights or old cannon balls – aggressive objects suggestive of a masculine world of warfare and industry, despite their feminine ‘diamond’ embellishments; and this while the ink drawings, which leap into the gallery space, break the conventional

rules of display. The choice of paper, as a support for the array of images they carry, is designed to offer an alternative route within the actual exhibition space.

The main themes tackled in the show are those that preoccupy us in our individual artistic practice. We are concerned with notions of beauty and with the creative process, one that is motivated by the ‘cultivation’ and generation of ideas and things of beauty, as well as the role or error and coincidence within this process. In our sculptural wall piece, which consists of a cluster of oversized ink splatters that appear to have been carelessly splashed on the wall, it is this allegedly accidental ‘error’ that seems to have generated this new form of beauty. This ‘error’ takes its place within a carefully constructed work of art, where each such stain was meticulously hand-made and hung on the wall according to a carefully devised pattern. Our hothouse, as a site of both alchemy and trial and error, enables us to bring about these fruitful contradictions, with which we may question and challenge the accepted notions of beauty in the art world.

Tal Frank and Keren Anavy

*A Kibbutz is a communal form of settlement unique to the Zionist movement in Israel. It is founded on socialist values, equality and the sharing of economic and resources and ideas between its members.

Crossover 2014

Collaborative Project with Keren Anavy & Quayola


Feinberg Projects Gallery


Video Installation, Ink Drawings & Mixed Media on Wood


The gallery space is transformed into an environment that is simultaneously natural and artificial. The installation contains sculptures by Frank and drawings by Anavi placed side by side, reflected one upon the other and also impacting each other. Quayola’s video installation fits in this setting naturally – he too explores the tension between the real and the artificial, the simulated. Anavi’s drawings climb on the gallery’s walls as climbing vegetation would, composed of individual fragments that together create the resemblance of a complete drawing, surrounding, climbing on the spectator, bursting out everywhere. Frank’s sculptural installation is composed of mirrors placed on the floor, cut into shapes reminiscent of water drops and wavelets, manually engraved with geometric shapes that create the illusion of fractures or freezing on the mirrors. Quayola’s video work depicts a moving object based on an original art piece brought to life. Drawing and video are reflected on the gallery’s floor, creating endless frames of intersections between works, observable from any angle in the gallery. Within the installation, chunks of wood by Frank, processed, artificial-looking and massive, resembling umbrellas, lay on the floor, as if cast aside after a storm.

The integrated body of works create a fictional surrounding after an aesthetic apocalypse, enabled by the language of art. Through their common dialog the artists deal with the relations between the whole and its parts, abstract and concrete. Relations originated from time and movement, and from attempts at discovering and establishing new, unpredictable regularities.

1 bag up to 23 kg, 2013

Berliner Liste 2013, Booth A2.03

The project is a representation of the “take only what you can carry” predicament: All sculptures exhibited were transported in my suitcases on a tourist class flight from Tel Aviv to Berlin. What to take? How to choose? In his Boîte-en-valise, Duchamp packed his whole life. I understood on hindsight that I chose objects related to my past, nostalgic represenations of childhood memories and feelings. But the project is also a metaphor through which I refer and relate to several pressing socio-economic and psychological issues faced by artists as myself, such as striving to make a living out of art, and living in the periphery while always contemplating emmigration to the center.

Firing Squad

Aluminium Casting 35/29/32 cm

Smiling Fluorescent

Aluminium Casting 34/63/7 cm

Gazelle With AC

Fiberglass & Aluminum Casting 32/40/16

Rolling Ping Pong Rackets 

Mixed Wood and Rubber Technique 45/15/13 cm


2009 Aluminium Casting 20/16/9 cm


Mixed Media and Carving in Wood 65/15/5 cm

Shuriken Zebra  


Aluminium Casting 20/20/5 cm

How much farther 2011

Collaborative Project with Ran Bar-lev

121 Gallery For Contemporary Art, 









Drop Study


Carton Cutout and M.D.F. 34/72/102 cm

Drapery Study

Carton Cutout 70/60/12 cm

Leak Study


Carton Cutout 40/100/12 cm

Whirlpool Study

Carton Cutout and M.D.F. 80/50/50 cm

How Much Farther – Overview Installation